Subscribe to RSS Feed RSS Feed
 

Archive for April 7th, 2006

Topic: Yesterday's News?
07. April 2006
Comments
Re: Charlie Replies to Joe
by Joe on Wed 05 Apr 2006 12:24 PM EDT  |  IP: 24.252.200.38
Pay for performance hasn't even begun its
brief honeymoon period for the NSPS when I read this advice this
morning from the MSPB concerning the new government systems which will
reward performers so much better than the GS system:

The board
presented a number of issues agency heads need to address before
designing their systems. One is how costs will be kept under control.
The MSPB presented three choices: forced distribution of performance
ratings, limiting performance-based rewards to a top percentage of
employees or placing caps on pay progression.

Forced
distribution of performance ratings? If you are in an office filled
with high performers then obviously most of those high performers must
go unrewarded.

Limiting performance based rewards to a top
percentage of employees? Here again performance should be rewarded
according to individual contribution - not a quota system.

Placing
caps on pay progression? This one is actually what pay for performance
sytems are all about. Of course it has nothing to do with performance.

Welcome to the new world.

How far down the rabbit hole will we go…

Charlie Replies to Joe

Topic: Yesterday's News?
07. April 2006
Comments

Joe–

Sure it's not going to be easy to implement a fair pay for
performance system.  But it sounds like you are defending the
present system which rewards incompetents with automatic step and cost
of living increases.  With estimates of their number running to
more than 20% according to the Volcker Commission, it is hard to ignore
the problems they present.  The effort to meet this problem with
buy-outs has only resulted in the departure o f people who are
confident of their ability to get another job.