http://understandinggov.org/2008/05/29/your-money-at-work-texas-ag-spends-12-million-to-target-elderly-voters/ Informing the Public; Improving Government Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:32:56 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2 http://understandinggov.org/2008/05/29/your-money-at-work-texas-ag-spends-12-million-to-target-elderly-voters/#comment-648 Ned Hodgman Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:57:10 +0000 http://understandinggov.org/2008/05/29/your-money-at-work-texas-ag-spends-12-million-to-target-elderly-voters/#comment-648 I'm not sure what you mean by mailing a letter. The idea that people would be prosecuted for dropping envelopes from registered voters in a mailbox is a little insane in itself. But maybe you are referring to the idea that the whole act of mailing a letter is protected in some way? I’m not sure what you mean by mailing a letter. The idea that people would be prosecuted for dropping envelopes from registered voters in a mailbox is a little insane in itself. But maybe you are referring to the idea that the whole act of mailing a letter is protected in some way?

]]> http://understandinggov.org/2008/05/29/your-money-at-work-texas-ag-spends-12-million-to-target-elderly-voters/#comment-647 hampton Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:05:21 +0000 http://understandinggov.org/2008/05/29/your-money-at-work-texas-ag-spends-12-million-to-target-elderly-voters/#comment-647 Isn't mailing a letter protected by federal statute, and, further, isn't taking a letter to a mailbox to mail it inferentially covered by the same statute? Isn’t mailing a letter protected by federal statute, and, further, isn’t taking a letter to a mailbox to mail it inferentially covered by the same statute?

]]>