CHANGE THE SENATE CAN’T BELIEVE IN
Topic: Beltway Outsider30. April 2009 Comments
Janet Hook of the Los Angeles Times has a really good piece on how the budget the House and Senate approved yesterday differs from the budget Barack Obama sent them:
Congress has called for ending Obama’s signature campaign promise to the middle class — tax credits of as much as $800 for many families — after two years. And lawmakers did not endorse his proposal to curb tax deductions for the upper class to help pay for healthcare reform, but did keep in place billions of dollars in subsidies to agriculture.
Republicans in both chambers unanimously opposed the budget (as did Republican-turned-Democrat Arlen Specter). But budgets don’t need filibuster-proof majorities to pass, so why did Obama’s redistribution plans die? "Underlying the predictable partisan byplay," Hook writes, "The budget debate has been a monument to the durability of the special interests and political forces that make it hard even for Democrats to curb subsidies to the wealthy."
George W. Bush significantly skewed the distribution of wealth further to the rich with the full backing of a Republican-controlled Senate. Now Obama wants to partly undo some Bush administration policies and his own party trips him up. People compare the changes Obama wants to make with those enacted by FDR. But at this point the Obama administration is stymied in even returning the tax code to what it was in the Bill Clinton administration.-MB





understandinggov.org