Beltway Outsider 

Matthew Blake’s view from Chicago, Ill. on the Obama administration and executive branch performance.

Earmarks and the F-35  

Cat.: Beltway Outsider, Dept. of Defense
12. March 2010
Comments

A House plan to eliminate earmarks that largely benefit military contractors has made headlines the past couple of days. But these earmarked projects make up only $1.7 billion of the federal budget. The Washington Post’s Dana Hedgpeth reports on a much bigger instance of government waste:

Michael Sullivan, the U.S. Government Accountability Office’s top analyst on Lockheed Martin’s jet fighter, also known as the F-35 Lightning II, told the Senate Armed Services Committee in a hearing that the cost of the program has increased substantially and that development is 2 1/2 years behind schedule. (more…)

Health Care Reform = No Immigration Reform  

Cat.: Beltway Outsider
12. March 2010
Comments

Lindsey Graham

So writes the New York Times’ Julia Preston, reporting on talks between Barack Obama and South Carolina GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham — the one senate Republican in support of immigration reform:

But Mr. Graham, in a statement, said he had told Mr. Obama “in no uncertain terms” that the immigration debate “could come to a halt for the year” if the president moved to pass health care legislation by a method known as reconciliation, which requires a majority of 51 senators instead of 60 and would in practice require no Republican votes.

The White House has been laying the groundwork for a possible reconciliation vote since losing its supermajority in January after the Massachusetts Senate election and finding no Republican support. There was no indication Thursday that Mr. Obama would reconsider that in light of Mr. Graham’s warning. (more…)

Well, Here’s One Kind Of Public Option  

Cat.: Beltway Outsider, Dept. of Education
12. March 2010
Comments

It looks like the U.S. Senate will tack student loan reform onto their final health care bill after all, reports the New York Times’ David Herzenhorn and Tamar Lewin. So if the bill passes, the federal Education Department would administer all federal student loans instead of subsidizing private banks to handle some of these loans. Also, the education provisions in the bill would increase money for Pell grants, the Education Department’s main grant program to help students pay for college.

I’m not a big fan of attaching provisions to bills that have little to do with the overall bill. But the current student loan system is notably bad and the upper chamber’s recent track record suggests they might not otherwise do an up-down vote on stand-alone student loan reform.

Earmarks: Government’s Most Overrated Problem  

Cat.: Beltway Outsider, Dept. of Defense
11. March 2010
Comments

The New York Times’ Eric Lichtblau reports that House Democratic leaders have banned budget earmarks provided for government projects handled by for-profit companies. These earmarks are mostly no-bid military contracts that lawmakers write for home-district defense contractors.

The earmark ban is a worthy response to a recent Office of Congressional Ethics Report that documented the snug relationship between defense lobbyists and lawmakers on the House appropriations subcommittee on defense. But it’s hardly a landmark for either lobbying and ethics reform or fiscal responsibility. (more…)

Obama And The Awful Student Loan System  

Cat.: Beltway Outsider, Dept. of Education
11. March 2010
Comments

There’s been talk that the Obama administration will use the final health care legislation bill as a vehicle to reform the awful, wretched, wasteful, unfair and embarrassing federal student loan system. But Lori Montgomery and Shailagh Murray of the Washington Post say it’s probably not going to happen:

Democratic leaders met for a second day Wednesday with administration officials, including White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, in the office of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), but reached no decision on the student loan measure. One participant said a consensus appeared to be emerging that it would be unwise to risk the health-care bill by including the education measure.

This makes sense in theory: student loan reform has very little to do with health care reform. But Obama and Congress better accomplish student loan reform in 2010. (more…)

And You Thought Washington Was Bad  

Cat.: Beltway Outsider, Government in My Backyard (GIMBY)
11. March 2010
Comments

Pat Quinn

The Chicago Tribune’s Ray Long, Monique Garcia and Bob Secter have a good report on Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn’s proposal to raise the state income tax rate from three percent to four percent (or as the paper more dramatically puts it: a 33 percent raise). Quinn is proposing this because on July 1, the deadline for the Illinois governor to sign a balanced budget, the state is expected to have a $13 billion deficit. That’s an astonishing deficit for a state government that spends about $26 billion a year.

Quinn, up for election this year, has predictably run into opposition from state Republican lawmakers also up for reelection. But even the Illinois Democratic Speaker of the House, Mike Madigan, (speaker of the house since 1983), says, “The people of America don’t want tax increases…they’re hurting.” The Tribune, though, outlines why Illinois needs to raise taxes. A proposed no-tax hike budget would, for example, result in 17,000 teachers getting laid off. (more…)

What Now For Tim Geithner  

Cat.: Beltway Outsider, Dept. of the Treasury
10. March 2010
Comments

John Cassidy’s New Yorker profile of Tim Geithner mostly makes a single argument, with that argument contained in the  sub-head: “Timothy Geithner’s financial plan is working — and making him very unpopular.” This has become the prevailing wisdom on the Geithner beat — summarized equally well a few weeks ago by the Wall Street Journal’s Deborah Solomon. This part of Cassidy’s conclusion, though, is fresh and interesting: (more…)

Teen Idles  

Cat.: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Beltway Outsider, Dept. of Labor, Government in My Backyard (GIMBY)
10. March 2010
Comments

The Chicago Tribune’s Mary Owens has a good piece on one consequence of the recession — the lack of summer jobs for teenagers. Jobs that teens in Chicago, and elsewhere, used to get at fast food restaurants or retail stores either no longer exist or have been taken by college graduates or more experienced employees laid off from their previous jobs. Owens writes that the lack of teen jobs, “leaves the city susceptible to more gang violence, teen pregnancy and drug use — known consequences of idle teenagers.”

Ironically, the one part of the stimulus bill where the federal government directly created employment was a youth jobs program last summer. Chicago still has $17.3 million in federal stimulus money for summer youth jobs. But the money is only expected to reach a fraction of applicants. And those who get jobs will likely be working about 20 hours a week for minimum wage.

As I’ve reported, the summer jobs program was largely successful. But it didn’t do enough to help troubled teens — or alter a teen unemployment rate that stands at a record 26 percent.

U.S. Senate Hasn’t Got Around To Caring About Salmonella  

Cat.: Beltway Outsider, Food & Drug Administration
10. March 2010
Comments

The Food and Drug Administration claims that the company Basic Food Flavors has knowingly sold vegetable protein laced with salmonella. The Washington Post’s Lyndsey Layton reports that a food maker who purchased products from Basic Food Flavors tipped off the FDA and the agency subsequently inspected the Food Flavors plant. But why did federal regulators wait until after the dangerous vegetable protein was discovered to inspect the offending plant?

Well, because of the U.S. Senate. “Legislation that would require companies to take measures to prevent contamination was overwhelmingly passed by the House last year,” Layton writes,  “but has been held up in the Senate.” (more…)

Teaching to the Same Test  

Cat.: Beltway Outsider, Dept. of Education
10. March 2010
Comments

The Washington Post’s Nick Anderson reports that all 50 of the nation’s governors have approved national standards for what students are expected to know in math and English. This is really good news. An argument against national standards is an argument against standards-based education policy.  However, both Democratic and Republican politicians have expressed a clear desire for education standards (often measured through standardized tests). So…if you’re going to have standards, it’s critical that some states don’t set easier standards and then make empty claims about proficient students and quality schools. This has happened repeatedly in enforcement of No Child Left Behind. It no longer will.