<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Understanding Government &#187; Cronyism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://understandinggov.org/category/work-force/work-forcepolitical-appointments/work-forcepolitical-appointmentscronyism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://understandinggov.org</link>
	<description>Informing the Public; Improving Government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:34:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>AFFIRMATIVE ACTION OR CRONYISM?</title>
		<link>http://understandinggov.org/2008/04/18/affirmative-action-or-cronyism/</link>
		<comments>http://understandinggov.org/2008/04/18/affirmative-action-or-cronyism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ned Hodgman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cronyism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dept. of Housing & Urban Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Once in a Lifetime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understandinggov.org/2008/04/18/affirmative-action-or-cronyism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Sunday, the Washington Post took a look at how recently departed Housing and Urban Development Secretary Alphonso Jackson ignored the mortgage crisis. Today the New York Times&#8217; Rachel Swarns examines the other key component of Jackson&#8217;s dubious legacy&#8212;millions in housing contracts to his friends. The twist is that instead of lying low during a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p>Last Sunday, the <em style="">Washington Post</em> took a look at how recently departed Housing and Urban Development Secretary Alphonso Jackson ignored the mortgage crisis. Today the <em style="">New York Times&rsquo;</em> Rachel Swarns examines the other key component of <st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Jackson</st1:place></st1:city>&rsquo;s dubious legacy&mdash;millions in housing contracts to his friends.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The twist is that instead of lying low during a federal probe of <st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Jackson</st1:place></st1:city>, the enriched friends are publicly making no apologies for their HUD connections. Indeed, the African-American contractors interviewed by Swarns said that they were doing their part to help minority-owned businesses and rebuild black communities.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">And <st1:state w:st="on">South Carolina</st1:state>&rsquo;s James Clyburn, the third-ranking Democrat in the House, defends <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:city w:st="on">Jackson</st1:city></st1:place>&rsquo;s work as aggressive affirmative action. It&rsquo;s an interesting defense, one that resonates in a town where &ldquo;favors&rdquo; are done all the time, and where some favors may still be more equal than others. <span style="">&nbsp;</span>Investigators are largely focused on payments made to <st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Jackson</st1:place></st1:city> during his term at HUD for work done that was done before his tenure. <span style="">&nbsp;</span><a href="http://understandinggov.org/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5ueXRpbWVzLmNvbS8yMDA4LzA0LzE4L3dhc2hpbmd0b24vMThqYWNrc29uLmh0bWw=" target=\"Resigning HUD Secretary Alphonso Jackson investigated for directing contracts to friends in the African-American community but others call it affirmative action or simply normal business practices\">Read Swarns here</a>. <span style="">&nbsp;</span>MB</p>
 <img src="http://understandinggov.org/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=1026" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://understandinggov.org/2008/04/18/affirmative-action-or-cronyism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CONTRACTING CRONYISM AT AIR FORCE</title>
		<link>http://understandinggov.org/2008/04/18/contracting-cronyism-at-air-force/</link>
		<comments>http://understandinggov.org/2008/04/18/contracting-cronyism-at-air-force/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ned Hodgman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracting and contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cronyism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dept. of the Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Once in a Lifetime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://understandinggov.org/2008/04/18/contracting-cronyism-at-air-force/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Post&#8217;s Josh White reports on a fishy $50 million contract given to Strategic Message Solutions. The company had &#8220;barely existed&#8221; in 2005, but the contract was given that year &#8220;to reward a recently retired four-star general and a millionaire civilian pilot who had grown close to the Air Force.&#8221; Strategic Message Solutions&#8217; bid [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">The <st1:state w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on"><em style="">Washington</em></st1:place></st1:state><em style=""> Post&rsquo;s</em> Josh White reports on a fishy $50 million contract given to Strategic Message Solutions. The company had &ldquo;barely existed&rdquo; in 2005, but the contract was given that year &ldquo;to reward a recently retired four-star general and a millionaire civilian pilot who had grown close to the Air Force.&rdquo;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Strategic Message Solutions&rsquo; bid to help add color to Air Force air shows was twice as high as its next closest competitor. This is not the first time camaraderie has trumped fair contracting at the Air Force. A contracting officer went to jail a year ago for doing favors to mega-contractor Boeing.&nbsp; <a href="http://understandinggov.org/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy53YXNoaW5ndG9ucG9zdC5jb20vd3AtZHluL2NvbnRlbnQvYXJ0aWNsZS8yMDA4LzA0LzE3L0FSMjAwODA0MTcwMjI0OC5odG1s">Read White here</a>. <span style="">&nbsp;</span>MB</p>
 <img src="http://understandinggov.org/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=1024" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://understandinggov.org/2008/04/18/contracting-cronyism-at-air-force/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charles Peters:  Recess Appointments: A Different Approach Jan. 8 2006</title>
		<link>http://understandinggov.org/2006/01/09/charles-peters-recess-appointments-a-different-approach-jan-8-2006/</link>
		<comments>http://understandinggov.org/2006/01/09/charles-peters-recess-appointments-a-different-approach-jan-8-2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Understanding Government</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charles Peters: Speaking His Mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cronyism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Appointments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsite.understandinggov.org/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a move that mocked career civil servants, decades of efforts to help developing countries stem population growth and the presidential appointments process itself,&#160; President Bush in early 2006 granted a recess appointment to former Maryland state delegate and twice unsuccessful candidate for governor, Ellen Sauerbrey.&#160; Sauerbrey, who ran Bush&#39;s first campaign in Maryland, will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a move that mocked career civil servants, decades of efforts to help developing countries stem population growth and the presidential appointments process itself,&nbsp; President Bush in early 2006 granted a recess appointment to former Maryland state delegate and twice unsuccessful candidate for governor, Ellen Sauerbrey.&nbsp; Sauerbrey, who ran Bush&#39;s first campaign in Maryland, will lead the State Department&#39;s bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration.&nbsp; Bush named 16 others to administration posts using his power to skirt Senate confirmation hearings during congressional recesses.</p>
<p>Should presidents have the power to make recess appointments?&nbsp; In all cases?&nbsp; Defendants are guaranteed speedy trials by the constitution.&nbsp; Maybe presidential nominees should enjoy the same protection.&nbsp; If the Senate failed to provide speedy hearings, then and only then the president would be able to make a recess appointment.&nbsp; Or maybe once the Senate delays for&nbsp;X weeks or months, the nominee is automatically put to a vote of the entire body.&nbsp; The Senate would still have the right to filibuster with a 60-vote margin.&nbsp; </p>
 <img src="http://understandinggov.org/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=110" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://understandinggov.org/2006/01/09/charles-peters-recess-appointments-a-different-approach-jan-8-2006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tomorrow:  Ellen Sauerbrey and DOS: CRONYISM IS alive and well.</title>
		<link>http://understandinggov.org/2005/11/02/tomorrow-ellen-sauerbrey-and-dos-cronyism-is-alive-and-well/</link>
		<comments>http://understandinggov.org/2005/11/02/tomorrow-ellen-sauerbrey-and-dos-cronyism-is-alive-and-well/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 11:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Understanding Government</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cronyism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsite.understandinggov.org/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web Posted: 11/01/2005 12:00 AM CST San Antonio Express-News In the wake of the disaster of Michael Brown as director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, another nominee to high-level government position is justifiably drawing fire as a potential &#8220;crony&#8221; appointment. She is Ellen Sauerbrey, nominated to be undersecretary of state for population, refugees and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="-1"><strong></p>
<h5>Web Posted: 11/01/2005 12:00 AM CST</h5>
<p></strong></font></p>
<p><font size="-1"><strong></p>
<h4>San Antonio Express-News</h4>
<p></strong></font></p>
<p>In the wake of the disaster of Michael Brown as director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, another nominee to high-level government position is justifiably drawing fire as a potential &#8220;crony&#8221; appointment. </p>
<p>She is Ellen Sauerbrey, nominated to be undersecretary of state for population, refugees and migration, which manages a $700 million budget. </p>
<p>She was a two-time losing GOP candidate for governor of Maryland and ran the president&#39;s campaign there in 2000. But she has no experience managing humanitarian crises or the plight of refugees, which is what the job requires. The post usually goes to an expert rather than a political appointee. </p>
<p>In addition, as the Bush appointee as U.S. envoy to the United Nations on women&#39;s issues, she has been hostile to woman&#39;s rights, family planning and child and material health, according to 12 organizations that oppose her selection. </p>
<p>Surely, the president can do better. </p>
 <img src="http://understandinggov.org/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=78" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://understandinggov.org/2005/11/02/tomorrow-ellen-sauerbrey-and-dos-cronyism-is-alive-and-well/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Miers Withdraws: So much for Cronyism?</title>
		<link>http://understandinggov.org/2005/10/27/miers-withdraws-so-much-for-cronyism/</link>
		<comments>http://understandinggov.org/2005/10/27/miers-withdraws-so-much-for-cronyism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Understanding Government</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cronyism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsite.understandinggov.org/?p=68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the latest news from a variety of sources, I use Google News as my homepage &#8230;&#8230;For links to 1652 stories, so far, on Miers&#39; resignation, see news.google.com. Before we mourn the demise of&#160; cronyism, let&#39;s wait and see who Bush nominates next.&#160; Odds anyone?&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the latest news from a variety of sources, I use Google News as my<br />
homepage &#8230;&#8230;For links to 1652 stories, so far, on Miers&#39;<br />
resignation, see news.google.com.<br />
Before we mourn the demise of&nbsp; cronyism, let&#39;s wait and see who Bush nominates next.&nbsp; Odds anyone?&nbsp; </p>
 <img src="http://understandinggov.org/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=68" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://understandinggov.org/2005/10/27/miers-withdraws-so-much-for-cronyism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>They used to transfer people to the border&#8230;..</title>
		<link>http://understandinggov.org/2005/10/14/they-used-to-transfer-people-to-the-border/</link>
		<comments>http://understandinggov.org/2005/10/14/they-used-to-transfer-people-to-the-border/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Understanding Government</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cronyism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsite.understandinggov.org/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: Re: Re: Julie Myers &#8212; very interesting by Anonymous on 2005.10.13 07:00PM EDT &#160;&#124;&#160; IP: &#160; They used to transfer people to the border, but there&#39;s no money for that now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>Re: Re: Re: Julie Myers &#8212; very interesting</div>
<div>by Anonymous on 2005.10.13 07:00PM EDT &nbsp;|&nbsp; IP: </div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>They used to transfer people to the border, but there&#39;s no money for that now.</div>
</div>
 <img src="http://understandinggov.org/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=50" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://understandinggov.org/2005/10/14/they-used-to-transfer-people-to-the-border/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time for TimeOut at ICE</title>
		<link>http://understandinggov.org/2005/10/14/time-for-timeout-at-ice/</link>
		<comments>http://understandinggov.org/2005/10/14/time-for-timeout-at-ice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Understanding Government</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cronyism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsite.understandinggov.org/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: Re: Julie Myers &#8212; very interesting by Anonymous on 2005.10.13 06:58PM EDT &#160;&#124;&#160; IP: I can only tell you my own experience. In my office, you have to be in the right clique to even be allowed to do your jub. It doesn&#39;t matter if you have a strong knowledge of a particular kind [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>Re: Re: Julie Myers &#8212; very interesting</div>
<div>by Anonymous on 2005.10.13 06:58PM EDT &nbsp;|&nbsp; IP: </div>
<div>I can only tell you my own experience. In my<br />
office, you have to be in the right clique to even be allowed to do<br />
your jub. It doesn&#39;t matter if you have a strong knowledge of a<br />
particular kind of investigation (there are so many disparate areas of<br />
investigation now that no agent can be proficient, or even competent,<br />
in all). When an agentr, always a friend of the Special Agent in Charge<br />
(SAC) is promoted to supervisor, qualified or not, the first order of<br />
business is to have everyone he/she doesn&#39;t like transferred out of the<br />
group and his/her friends brought in. ALWAYS. </p>
<p>The immigration<br />
groups, which do primarily administrative processing of aliens, is used<br />
to punish agents who have displeased their supervisors. Oh management<br />
suspends agents pretty freely these days, but the transfer to a group<br />
where you won&#39;t be allowed to do the job you love is the real<br />
punishment. I have never in my 6 years in this office seen anyone come<br />
out of punishment. I know several senior grade 13, very experienced,<br />
effective agents in several different cities who are now typing aliens&#39;<br />
paperwork because they spoke out of turn to supervisors. Can&#39;t do that<br />
in this agency. </p>
<p>There are supervisors in the office who say<br />
that women won&#39;t be allowed to participate in search warrants or<br />
arrests, who order agents to lie in affidavits, who sabotage agents&#39;<br />
cases, who blame agents for their own mistakes, and probably many more<br />
things I don&#39;t know about. If an agent not in their clique stands up<br />
for himself/herself, they&#39;re going to be moved. </p>
<p>Work quality<br />
is measured only at the U. S. Attorney&#39;s office. They&#39;re the client.<br />
They can&#39;t help but recognize when you&#39;ve conducted an outstanding<br />
investigation. Internally, nobody cares. That may be because nobody<br />
knows. In 6 years, I have had 2 and only 2 case reviews with my<br />
supervisor. </p>
<p>There&#39;s more but it makes me tired to think about<br />
it too long. These are the things happening that are really the driving<br />
force behind the mass exodus of agents.</p></div>
</div>
 <img src="http://understandinggov.org/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=49" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://understandinggov.org/2005/10/14/time-for-timeout-at-ice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: Julie Myers &#8212; very interesting</title>
		<link>http://understandinggov.org/2005/10/09/re-julie-myers-very-interesting/</link>
		<comments>http://understandinggov.org/2005/10/09/re-julie-myers-very-interesting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 05:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Understanding Government</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cronyism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsite.understandinggov.org/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An anonymous poster on ICE (see below).&#160; We&#39;d love to hear more:&#160; I keep hearing agency is a mess.&#160; Can readers give us explanation from inside? I think the law requires the head of Immigration &#38; Customs Enforcement to have 5 years law enforcement experience, which I know that Ms. Myers doesn&#39;t, and 5 years [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>An anonymous poster on ICE (see<br />
below).&nbsp; We&#39;d love to hear more:&nbsp; I keep hearing agency is a<br />
mess.&nbsp; Can readers give us explanation from inside?</p>
<p></p>
<div>I think the law<br />
requires the head of Immigration &amp; Customs Enforcement to have 5<br />
years law enforcement experience, which I know that Ms. Myers doesn&#39;t,<br />
and 5 years management experience. I think she has 1 or 2 years.</p>
<p>The agency is a mess. From the border &amp; airport inspection<br />
side, I guess it makes sense to combine Immigration &amp; Customs. From<br />
the investigative side, the 2 agencies have such different missions.<br />
There is no sense to combining them into one giant agency. And just to<br />
make one thing clear &#8211; as we were told 30 days after the creation of<br />
DHS in 2003, &#8220;We don&#39;t investigate terrorism.&#8221;</p></div>
</div>
 <img src="http://understandinggov.org/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=39" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://understandinggov.org/2005/10/09/re-julie-myers-very-interesting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Julie Myers/Answer to Cronyism Question</title>
		<link>http://understandinggov.org/2005/10/09/julie-myersanswer-to-cronyism-question-2/</link>
		<comments>http://understandinggov.org/2005/10/09/julie-myersanswer-to-cronyism-question-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 05:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Understanding Government</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cronyism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsite.understandinggov.org/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: Cronyism: Questions About Julie Myers by Anonymous on 2005.10.08 01:56PM EDT &#160;&#124; I read the same thing. I think the law requires the head of Immigration &#38; Customs Enforcement to have 5 years law enforcement experience, which I know that Ms. Myers doesn&#39;t, and 5 years management experience. I think she has 1 or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>Re: Cronyism: Questions About Julie Myers</div>
<div>by Anonymous on 2005.10.08 01:56PM EDT &nbsp;| 
</div>
<div>I read the same thing. I think the law<br />
requires the head of Immigration &amp; Customs Enforcement to have 5<br />
years law enforcement experience, which I know that Ms. Myers doesn&#39;t,<br />
and 5 years management experience. I think she has 1 or 2 years.</p>
<p>The agency is a mess. From the border &amp; airport inspection<br />
side, I guess it makes sense to combine Immigration &amp; Customs. From<br />
the investigative side, the 2 agencies have such different missions.<br />
There is no sense to combining them into one giant agency. And just to<br />
make one thing clear &#8211; as we were told 30 days after the creation of<br />
DHS in 2003, &#8220;We don&#39;t investigate terrorism.&#8221;</p></div>
</div>
 <img src="http://understandinggov.org/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=38" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://understandinggov.org/2005/10/09/julie-myersanswer-to-cronyism-question-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Julie Myers/Answer to Cronyism Question</title>
		<link>http://understandinggov.org/2005/10/09/julie-myersanswer-to-cronyism-question/</link>
		<comments>http://understandinggov.org/2005/10/09/julie-myersanswer-to-cronyism-question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 05:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Understanding Government</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cronyism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsite.understandinggov.org/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: Cronyism: Julie Myers at ICE by Anonymous on 2005.10.09 03:50PM EDT &#160;&#124;&#160;&#160; The singular qualification necessary for appointment to a senior level position is loyalty to GW. Career/professional experience is irrelevant. Ms. Myers mission will not be to support the employees of ICE, or even the enforcement of customs and immigration laws. Her mission [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>Re: Cronyism: Julie Myers at ICE</div>
<div>by Anonymous on 2005.10.09 03:50PM EDT &nbsp;|&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="http://understandinggov.org/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?url=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5ibG9nd2FyZS5jb20vYWRtaW4vaW5kZXguY2dpL2FkZHJlc3M9NjkuMTgwLjMxLjIzL2NtZD1tYW5hZ2VfcHJpdnMjaXA="></a></div>
<div>The singular qualification necessary for<br />
appointment to a senior level position is loyalty to GW.<br />
Career/professional experience is irrelevant. Ms. Myers mission will<br />
not be to support the employees of ICE, or even the enforcement of<br />
customs and immigration laws. Her mission will be to support GW and<br />
further a political agenda. Sad but true. </div>
</div>
 <img src="http://understandinggov.org/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=37" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://understandinggov.org/2005/10/09/julie-myersanswer-to-cronyism-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
